Search This Blog

Thursday, May 19, 2011

white iphone 4 release date us

white iphone 4 release date us. white iphone 4 release date
  • white iphone 4 release date



  • littleman23408
    Dec 3, 03:03 PM
    Do you get a prize car for finishing a series in Aspec races with all gold? Like I just need to finish one more race, but I can't find a used car to get into it. It's the first series of races, beginner I am assuming.





    white iphone 4 release date us. white iphone 4 release date
  • white iphone 4 release date



  • NoSmokingBandit
    Aug 11, 07:14 AM
    The only official date given to the game is Nov 2, but there were vague dates before then. They showed it at E3 '06, but it wasnt supposed to be a launch title.





    white iphone 4 release date us. white iphone 4 release date us
  • white iphone 4 release date us



  • TitoC
    Jun 9, 01:44 PM
    According to RadioShack's official Twitter account, the electronics chain will be carrying iPhone 4 as of its U.S. launch on June 24th.

    That's "THE SHACK" to you sir! Sorry, I still can't over this crappy, crappy branding decision of theirs to call themselves "The Shack." Really?

    When I watched basketball performances, it was from "The Shack." When I was 12, I had my porno hidden in "The Shack." And when I was 15 and in the Boy Scouts and I went camping/boating, I took a crap in "The Shack." But, when I was 16 and built a home-made rocket, I got my parts from "RADIO SHACK."





    white iphone 4 release date us. the white iPhone 4 could
  • the white iPhone 4 could



  • a.gomez
    Apr 6, 02:37 PM
    It'll be 100,001 when it comes out in the UK when mine gets delivered..... Roll on Saturday!:D

    100,002

    my cousin got his from Costco last night - he was waiting for the Wi-Fi only one





    white iphone 4 release date us. white iphone 4 release date
  • white iphone 4 release date



  • craig jones
    Sep 13, 12:58 PM
    Arrays of cheap RAM on a PCIe card?

    The RAM companies don't seem interested in making wodges of slow cheap hi-cap ram, only in bumping up the speed and upping the capacity. For the last 10 years, a stick of decent RAM has always been about �100/ $100 no matter what the capacity / flavour of the moment is.

    Even slow RAM is still orders of magnitude faster than a HD, hence my point. There's various historical and technical factors as to why we have the current situation.

    I've also looked at RAID implementations (I run a RAID5) but each RAID level has its own problems.

    I've recently seen that single-user RAID3 might be one way forward for the desktop, but don't really know enough about it yet.

    Slow RAM may be faster than hard disk but it's too slow for main memory. It could be useful for disk cache but products like that came and went. If such hardware could actually result in performance improvements to justify their costs then you'd see products that used them.

    As for RAID 3, it has been used before but really has no place considering modern disk drives and workloads. RAID 3 and 4, in order to work properly, require spindle sync. Workstations have no business implementing any parity-based RAID scheme. Servers used RAID 5 when they have high capacity needs and aren't sensitive to write performance.





    white iphone 4 release date us. white iphone 4 release date us
  • white iphone 4 release date us



  • Demoman
    Sep 15, 10:52 PM
    Uh, last time I checked, Windows can take advantage of multiple cores just fine. Do you think that multithreading is some Black Magic that only MacOS can do? Hell, standard Linux from kernel.org can use 512 cores as we speak!

    Related to this: Maybe not 512-way SMP, but here (http://www.linux-mips.org/wiki/IP27_boot_messages) is what it looks like when Linux boots on 128-way SGI Origin supercomputer. Note, the kernel that is booting is 2.4.1, which was released in early 2001. Things have progressed A LOT since those day.

    OS X works with quad core == "Ahead of technology curve"... puhleeze!



    Windows works just fine with dual-core. It really does. To Wndows, dual-core is more or less similar to typical SMP, and Windows has supported SMP since Windows NT!



    Any reason why it wouldn't work? And did you even read the Anandtech-article? They conducted their benchmarks in Windows XP! So it obviously DID work with four cores! And it DID show substantial improvement in performance in real-life apps! Sheesh! Dial tone that fanboysihness a bit, dude.

    I think the same applies to you, Bill. You seem to be here to act as a Microsoft evangelist.





    white iphone 4 release date us. iphone 4 white launch iphone 4
  • iphone 4 white launch iphone 4



  • SpinThis!
    Apr 12, 02:59 PM
    According to the SuperMeet (http://www.supermeet.com/) site, it looks like Apple has a 7pm (pacific) stage presentation.





    white iphone 4 release date us. white iphone 4 release date us
  • white iphone 4 release date us



  • Virtualball
    Apr 19, 02:19 PM
    Well if I'm wrong about the information, then I don't think anyone will argue about the fact that the Palm OS has been around since 1996, and the Apple iPhone uses a similar interface..

    All I'm saying is that If there were devices using a similar interface before the iPhone came out I don't see how its fair to sue anyone for it..

    http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/9153/palmtranicononpalmos.jpg

    Sigh, you're entirely missing the point of this case. No one's arguing that there's been a grid of icons before, it's just that Samsung went the extra step. See, Android itself doesn't have a near-identical desktop, but TouchWiz does. TouchWiz is what you see here, the icons have been made into squares (like the iPhone), there's now a Dock with frequently used apps with a grey background to distinguish it (like the iPhone), it has a black background (meh) but it uses white dots to note the page it's on (like the iPhone). They went the extra mile to provide an iPhone-like experience for their Android devices.





    white iphone 4 release date us. white iphone 4 release date
  • white iphone 4 release date



  • iMikeT
    Sep 19, 04:28 AM
    I sure hope that the MacBook (regular) line is update at next week's conference. That way, the MacBook my girlfriend just bought can get a Core 2 Duo update.





    white iphone 4 release date us. White Iphone 4 Release Date Us
  • White Iphone 4 Release Date Us



  • steve_hill4
    Jul 27, 02:13 PM
    What difference does it make if virtually no consumer software is effected by 64-bit processors, even now?
    Remember that the G5 is 64 bit. While the consumer apps may not be too directly affected at first, (speed increases, but nothing else), as more memory is required, 32 bit will hit a brick wall at 4GiB, whereas 64 bit can go along happily to 2,305,843,009,200,000,000GiB.

    Realistically, it will take some time to get to that level, but with the last G5 supporting 16GiB, 32 then 64 wouldn't be too far off. within 10 years, I'm sure 1TiB will start to become common.





    white iphone 4 release date us. white iphone 4 release date
  • white iphone 4 release date



  • Erasmus
    Jul 23, 05:09 AM
    (Lots of Stuff...)

    Well I bet that took a while...

    Excellent points. Especially liked the Microsoft joke!
    Never mind. Perhaps this forum will be ready for another of my spanners soon?

    Let's hope Apple engineers don't do anything bodgy.

    No word on TDP's of Clovertown and Kentsfield (Thanks mwswami)? Did I see that Kentsfield is two Conroes on the same chip? Would that mean the TDP would be roughly 130??? :eek: :eek: :eek:
    Certainly Uncool :cool:

    Won't give up hope yet on upgradeable iMac. Quad Cores here I come!

    BTW, I feel like such a noob for asking this, but when they say Santa Rosa will be able to support an 800Mhz FSB, is that talking about the RAM speed, up from 667Mhz?





    white iphone 4 release date us. white iphone 4 release date
  • white iphone 4 release date



  • superfula
    Apr 6, 10:53 AM
    Since you have no clue how the sandy bridge airs will perform, I'll take your statement as FUD.

    Of course we do. The integrated graphics card will perform just as poorly as every other Sandy Bridge processor because it's the same.





    white iphone 4 release date us. Apple promises iPhone 4 white
  • Apple promises iPhone 4 white



  • Iconoclysm
    Apr 20, 04:17 PM
    It does not matter that it was not US company as long as they were registered in US. Remember Apple suing Australian supermarket chain company for using as their log letter W which slightly resembled an apple?

    It did matter back then, when the best you could do was apply for a trademark in the US and be approved or not be approved. Apple is a global company, trademarked all over the world...not in the 70's.





    white iphone 4 release date us. White iPhone 4 release date
  • White iPhone 4 release date



  • GQB
    Mar 31, 05:10 PM
    Good. I hope they take one of the last strengths of the iPad ecosystem away from it.

    If you're going to spew nonsense, at least make it relevant to the thread.





    white iphone 4 release date us. White iPhone 4 set for a
  • White iPhone 4 set for a



  • lars steenhoff
    Apr 6, 05:01 PM
    For the time being, the new ati macbook pro's won't work as fast with premiere pro, as they could have when premiere would use openCL, instead of Cuda.
    Probably in the next version I guess, as openCL was not quite there yet when premiere CS5 was developed





    white iphone 4 release date us. white iphone 4 release date
  • white iphone 4 release date



  • studiomusic
    Apr 5, 11:09 PM
    Already have my tickets... I was looking forward to Kevin Smith and Philip Bloom, but FCP is a welcome announcement.
    Hopefully they'll give a bunch of copies of it for the Supermeet Super Raffle.





    white iphone 4 release date us. white iphone 4 release White
  • white iphone 4 release White



  • NinjaHERO
    Apr 25, 02:43 PM
    Yet another reason for us to look at the "Loser Pays" legal system. Maybe it will stop some of this silliness.





    white iphone 4 release date us. of the white iPhone 4.
  • of the white iPhone 4.



  • paul4339
    Mar 22, 01:00 PM
    Unfortunately you're so very right. Until it's in the hand and on the shelves it's vaporware.

    ...

    Yes, I think they should at least have a model that they can 'power on' before they say that it's going to be released on June 8 (that's just over 2 months away to get it working and out the door!)


    P.





    white iphone 4 release date us. us that the white iPhone 4
  • us that the white iPhone 4



  • playaj82
    Aug 8, 07:38 AM
    I know a lot of people are excited about Time Machine, but I was kind of worried last night when I showed it to one of my friends.

    Unlike Expose, Fast User Switching, iTunes, Dashboard, etc... that have immediate impact and understanding as to why the features are so neat, Time Machine is actually rather complicated.

    I explained and showed it to my friend, and she said, "so what, when I delete something it stays on the hard drive anyways"

    All of us here obviously understand the significance of this program, but does anybody else think this will be difficult to market to the "average" user.





    Silentwave
    Jul 14, 05:28 PM
    All three chips produce the same performance at the same clockspeed. Cache size may make a difference, but the Conroe models starting at 2.4 GHz all have the large 4 MB cache. So a single 2.66 GHz Woodcrest will be substantially slower than a 2.93 GHz Conroe. Not that it matters; the 2.93 GHz Conroe is extremely overpriced and unlikely to be used in any Macintosh.


    While I agree that the 2.93 Conroe is unlikely to make its way into the macs, I don't think the difference will be 'substantial.' The Woodcrest has a faster FSB, and most other variables are equal except clock speed. Based on the benchmarks on the various Conroe versions, I think that the 2.66 Woodcrest will offer performance only very slightly slower than Conroe 2.93.

    I personally would expect 2.0GHz Conroe, 2.66 GHz Conroe, 2 x 2 GHz Woodcrest and 2 x 2.66 GHz Woodcrest for a wide range from cheap to maximum performance.
    Just a nit, but IIRC isn't the codename for conroe based chips running at 2.4 and below with 2MB L2 caches Allendale? (there is a separate 2.4 with 4mb L2)
    I'm still not sure whether Apple will go all woodcrest to get better prices on chips and RAM (FB-DIMM is exclusive to woodcrest in apple's potential lineup)but I would expect either 2x2GHz or 2x2.3GHz as a low end quad, and either a 2x2.66 or 2x3.0 for the high end. Perhaps the 3.0GHz will be a BTO option for the 2x2.66, like the 2.16 was a BTO originally on the 2.0 MBP.

    "One more thing, you know we complained about not breaking 3GHz with Power-PC, so for our latest quad, we figured you'd all like to finally do that. So, you can order your top level 2.66 Xeon quad as a build to order with two of the 3.0GHz Xeon chips!"





    scott523
    Sep 19, 12:02 PM
    I hope that the MacBook with Core 2 Duo is better than the Core Duo version :)
    I think it's neither worse or better. Tests showed only a slight bump in speed and reduction in energy consumption. At least it's the best 64-bit Intel mobile processor we got until the next one comes in April/May. :cool:





    tribulation
    Nov 28, 08:12 PM
    what if i have no artists distributed by universal? if this takes effect then the ipod price will just go up and we all will be paying for it. what makes them think that i am even listening to any of their artists on my ipod and why should they get a cut if i dont >> or even if i do. ridiculous and better not happen.





    Dr.Gargoyle
    Aug 11, 10:50 AM
    These iPhone rumours continue to persist. I admit to being a sceptic, but maybe I'm wrong! I just hope that if they do do it, they do it well.
    It is an absolute necessity for Apple to introduce something like the iPhone. Especially after the introduction of cellphones like e.g. SE W810i which basically includes a top-of-the-line 4Gb Nano. The swan song of portable-mp3-only-players has begun.
    I am sure Rokr just was a big public hard/software test and not really intended to amaze the market as iPod once did.
    The upcoming iPhone on the other hand... I guess THAT is a whole different story.





    yadmonkey
    Aug 11, 03:17 PM
    Apple's reasons for being secretive about product releases don't apply to their potential phone because they don't have a current product which they want people to buy in the meantime. In fact, this time around, it'll be advantageous to Apple for people to know it's coming, as they may hold out for one instead of getting something else. Once there is an iPhone, then they will probably be secretive about the next version.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    LinkWithin

    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...